🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in graves at risk from shoreline retreat say that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is creating unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation details a series of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure sites. Authorities say it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. People will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves looking for valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while serving abroad. His mother expressed she could not sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to consider this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

An absence of consensus over when and how to handle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Some are calling for more coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to proceed for now. Different voices contend the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the options. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires productive community discussions to find the appropriate answers for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in life after death, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the physical loss of sacred ground.